The Scaling-Up Renewable Energy Program in Low Income Countries (SREP) is a targeted program of the Strategic Climate Fund (SCF), which is one of two funds within the Climate Investment Funds (CIF) framework.
The SREP was designed to demonstrate the economic, social and environmental viability of low carbon development pathways in the energy sector in low-income countries. It aims to help low-income countries use new economic opportunities to increase energy access through renewable energy use.
|Name of Fund||Scaling-Up Renewable Energy Program for Low Income Countries (SREP)|
|Official Fund Website||www.climateinvestmentfunds.org/cif/srep|
|Date Created||Date fund proposed: February 2008.
Date fund made operational: 14 December 2009.
|Proposed Life of Fund||The SREP is subject to the CIF ‘sunset clause’ which enables closure of funds once a new financial architecture becomes effective under the UNFCCC regime. Until such time, donors and recipients operate under the existing framework.|
|Administrating Organisation||The World Bank is the Trustee and Administrating Unit of the SREP.The World Bank Group, the African Development Bank, the Asian Development Bank, the European Development Bank, and the Inter-American Development Bank are the implementing agencies for SREP investments.|
|Activities Supported||SREP provides financing for renewable energy use and generation, specifically for proven “new” renewable energy technologies. For the purposes of SREP, new renewable energy technologies include solar, wind, bioenergy, and geothermal, as well as hydropower with capacities normally not exceeding 10MW per facility.
SREP also supports complementary technical assistance as this is considered essential for transformative and enduring change and country engagement and ownership. Technical assistance includes support for planning and pre-investment studies, policy development, legal and regulatory reform, business development and capacity building (including for knowledge management and monitoring and evaluation).
|Conditions and Eligibility Requirements||Eligible new renewable energy applications include:
Preference is given to projects with strong poverty alleviation benefits. Economic and/or social development and environmental benefits are key criteria for project selection.
Project proposals should demonstrate the potential to scale-up from lessons learned in pilot and demonstration projects and programs (such as those supported by the GEF). A key criterion will be the potential of the proposal for demonstration and replication, particularly the potential for removing barriers in the enabling environment beyond the immediate project boundary so as to facilitate scaling up through private sector investments.
Country selection criteria
For more detailed information on selection criteria: Criteria for Selecting Country and Regional Pilots under SREP (March 2010).
|Accessing the Fund||
|Uptake & Projects Supported||Pilot Countries
As of October 2015, 14 pilot countries have had Investment Plans endorsed for by the SREP Sub-Committee, for a total amount of proposed SREP funding of USD 511.5 million:
The following countries are in the process of developing investment plans for approval. Funding for these plans will be dependent on the SREP receiving further resources.
|Decision Making Structure||SREP Sub-Committee:
The SREP Sub-Committee was established to oversee and decide on the operations and activities of the SREP.
Composition of the SREP Sub-Committee
Decision-making is achieved through consensus.
The SREP Sub-Committee invites a number of active observers to attend its meetings, including representatives from:
These observers can add items to committee agendas, recommend external experts, and request verbal interventions during discussions.
An Expert Group was established by the SREP Sub-Committee to make recommendations on the selection of country or regional programs. The Expert Group recommended six pilot countries for SREP Sub-Committee consideration and a further three countries for consideration should additional funds become available or one of the initial pilots fails.
|Consultation with Non-Government Stakeholders||In designing the Climate Investment Funds, consultations took place with potential donors and recipients, the United Nations family, other multilateral development banks (MDBs), civil society organizations, and the private sector. The CIF were created on agreement from some 40 developing and industrialized countries.Nongovernmental actors have a direct role in the governance of the fund as detailed above. Representatives of NGOs and the private sector were also part of the expert group.|
|Information Disclosure||Pledges, deposits and funding decisions for SCF and its subsidiary funds (PPCR, SREP and FIP) are reported to the Sub Committee in biannual trustee reports.
In May 2009, the Trust Fund Committees approved a disclosure policy supporting in-country disclosure of country-owned investment plans and strategies (developed under each of the Trust Funds) prior to their submission to a CIF Committee for approval. Proposed plans are also posted on the CIF website no later than three weeks prior to review of the proposal by a Committee. In the case of proposed programs and projects, an information document describing the proposal is to be made public at least two weeks prior to a decision on the funding of the proposal. The policy recognizes that a country or a project proposer may have justifiable reasons for not publicly disclosing all information in an investment plan or project, and in exceptional cases, subject to Committee approval, certain information may be kept confidential.
The CIF has published open data on the results of SREP on its website since March 2016.
|Issues Raised||As the smallest and most recently established of the CIFs, there has been relatively less public commentary on its operations and objectives. Programme implementation remains in its early stages, and in some cases has been slower than anticipated.|
Relationship with Official Development Assistance
|Inclusion as Official Development Assistance||Yes.
The application of all CIF finance (concessional loans, grants, and guarantees through the MDBs) can be classed as ODA by MDBs if:
|Financial Instrument/ Delivery Mechanism Used (e.g. grant, loan)||SREP offers grant financing, blended with IDA and other concessional financing, to leverage other public and private sector resources. SREP uses a range of financial instruments that are already available in MDBs, including:
|Nature of Recipient Country Involvement||SREP pilots are country-led, build on and draw benefit from, national policies so that renewable energy is fully integrated into national energy plans. SREP activities are designed and implemented with the full and effective participation and involvement of, and with respect for the rights of, indigenous peoples and local communities.|